|
Fire assaying is the oldest and most reliable method of determining gold
and silver in rock or concentrate samples. This method is still the
industry standard. It is called ''fire'' assay because it involves
smelting the sample which has been mixed with lead oxide. Until electric
furnaces were available, samples were smelted literally in a fire.
Six steps
There are six steps in the fire assay procedure:
splitting - weighing - mixing firing - cupelling - parting.
First, the crushed and ground sample of ore or
concentrate is carefully split down to a smaller and, one hopes,
representative sample. This is usually done using a riffle splitter.
Finally a small sample of only around 30 grams is weighed out and added
to a crucible. To this is added a mixture of lead oxide, a reducing
agent and fluxes. The fluxes usually consist of silica sand, borax and
sometimes additional additives like fluorite. The fluxes, reductant,
lead oxide and sample are then mixed and fired in a, muffle furnace.
In the furnace the complete contents of the crucible
are melted. In the presence of the reducing agent, typically carbon in
any form, e.g. flour, the lead oxide is smelted to lead metal which
"collects" any silver and gold that may have been in the
sample. The molten mass is taken from the furnace and swirled to mix
before being poured into a cone-shaped mold and allowed to cool. The
molten lead sinks to the bottom of the mold, carrying any gold and
silver with it, while the rest of the components of the ore along with
the flux turn into a glassy slag that floats on top of the mold.
After cooling, the metallic lead "button" at
the bottom of the mold is separated from the glassy slag which is
discarded.
The metallic lead button is placed into a cupel, which
is a small dish made from bone ash, and placed into a cupelling furnace.
In the "cupelling" process lead metal turns back into oxide
which volatilizes away from the precious metals and soaks into the bone
ash cupel, leaving the minute amount of precious metals as a metallic
speck of metal called a "bead" on the bottom of the cupel.
Next, the bead is weighed on a microbalance to
determine the amount of gold and silver that was extractable from the
original ore sample. The bead is next heated in hot nitric acid which
dissolves away the silver, leaving any gold that may have been present.
This step is called "parting" because the nitric acid
"parts" the gold from the silver-gold mixture in the bead.
The parted bead is then carefully weighed and this
amount of gold is related back to the weight of ore or concentrate
sample in the first crucible that was fired.
In more modern laboratories, the bead of precious
metals that is recovered in the cupel after the lead has been removed is
dissolved in aqua regia. The resulting solution is then analyzed by
atomic absorption spectrometry, allowing the grade of gold and silver in
the original sample to be back calculated.
Is the fire assay
sample big enough?
The problem with fire assaying is not with the method
itself, but rather with the sample size that is used. Fire assaying
generally uses about one "assay ton" of pulverized sample,
i.e. 29.84 grams of material.
If much of the gold occurs in a deposit as small
"nuggets", then the chance of the assay ton sample's being
representative is remote. If even one of the smallest nuggets or
particles of visible gold gets into the small sample that is fire
assayed, then the result will be incredibly high. On the other hand, if
none of the minute gold particles in the ore get into the assay ton that
is fire assayed, then the assay result is likely to be lower than
reality.
Fire assaying is a science, and also to some extent
still an art. Certain types of ore contain elements that may interfere
with the result. A good fire assayer knows how to modify the composition
of the flux to avoid these problems.
The fire assayer knows how to determine the gold and
silver content of the assay ton of sample that has been presented to him
or her. The big question is whether that assay ton is truly
representative of the sample of core that it came from, and whether the
core sample itself is truly representative of the ore deposit from which
it came.
(Above article from "BCYCM'S
Prospecting School
)
B.C. & YUKON
CHAMBER OF MINES

|